This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Discipline

Aug. 31, 1999

Perilous Practice

^^Legal Ethics^^ Perilous Practice The California Supreme Court has issued a ruling that may result in disqualifying a firm from representing clients based on conflicts arising from client relationships of the firm's 'of counsel' attorneys.

        ^^The Adviser^^
        
        By Mallory J. Garner and Peter J. Kennedy
        
        Practitioners use the "of counsel" moniker to describe a variety of employment arrangements between attorneys and law firms. In some contexts, of counsel is a ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up