By Edwin Reeser
Cost cutting is not enough to resolve the operating model problem of BigLaw, as demonstrated by the partners at Clifford Chance voting to throw at least 10 percent of their own on the dinner table.
The situation as communicated by leadership was dire enough that more than the required two-thirds partners saw it in their urgent self interest to forcibly eject so many comrades from the firm. The precedent of a U.K. "Magic Circle" firm adopting such...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




