This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court

Apr. 3, 2009

U.S. Justices Rule Cost Concerns Pertinent in Power Plant Planning

In a defeat for environmentalists, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the EPA can take into account economic costs when considering what kind of technology energy companies should use to upgrade their power plants.

By Lawrence Hurley
Daily Journal Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - In a defeat for environmentalists, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the government can take into account economic costs when considering what kind of technology power plants should use to update their water-intake cooling mechanisms.

The court held that the decision made by the Bush administration's U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to adopt a cost-benefit analysis when decid...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up