This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Mar. 26, 2009

Decision on Mediation Agreements Puts the Cart Before the Horse

Many in the mediation community questioned the court's finding in In Re Estate of Thottam.

FORUM COLUMN

By Mary B. Culbert

Prior to the enactment of the current California Evidence Code Sections 1115 through 1128 in 1998 regarding mediation confidentiality, there was some confusion as to what a court of law would do when asked to enforce a mediation settlement agreement. In Ryan v. Garcia, 27 Cal.App.4th 1006 (1994), the court refused to allow testimony regarding an oral mediation agreement due to mediation confidentiality. In Regents o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up