This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Sep. 12, 2014

Justices to weigh 'state action' antitrust exemption

Simply put, the exemption is a blunt tool for ensuring good state government. By Daniel G. Swanson and Blaine H. Evanson


By Daniel G. Swanson and Blaine H. Evanson


When the U.S. Supreme Court begins its 2014 term next month, one of the first cases it will hear argued is North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission - an appeal from a decision that a state dentistry board engaged in a collective boycott in violation of federal antitrust laws by issuing cease-and-desist letters to prevent teeth-whitening companies from competing with licensed denti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up