This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate/Development

Oct. 19, 2006

Voting No on Eminent Domain Will Save Millions

FORUM COLUMN - By Bruce W. Beach - Playing off the national discussion on the proper limitations of the power of eminent domain after the landmark Supreme Court decision Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the authors and supporters of Proposition 90 would have voters believe it will reform current eminent-domain law to save homes and preserve property rights.


Forum Column

By Bruce W. Beach

     
      Playing off the national discussion on the proper limitations of the power of eminent domain after the landmark Supreme Court decision Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the authors and supporters of Proposition 90 would have voters believe it will reform current eminent-domain law to save homes and preserve property rights. Not o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up