This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 11, 2017

Anti-SLAPP protection shouldn't be limited to unlimited case

Restricting the use of a powerful and economical defensive tool to only those engaged in higher stakes litigation discriminates against limited jurisdiction litigants whose constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition are no less valuable. By Aaron J. Weissman and Farhad Novian

Aaron J. Weissman

R.J. Ryan Law APC

Phone: 818-956-2407

Email: aaron@rjryanlaw.com

Univ of West Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA

By Aaron J. Weissman and Farhad Novian

There have been countless recent decisions regarding the reach of Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16, which provides for an expedited procedure for dismissing lawsuits filed to inhibit the exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition. Regardless whether a matter is valued at greater or less than $25,000, a plaintiff's heinous conduct in pursuing improper, baseless and malicious ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up