This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Civil Litigation,
Law Practice,
Criminal

Dec. 23, 2016

Social media evidence: admissibility issues

Proponents seeking to admit social media evidence will face three primary hurdles of admissibility: relevance, authentication and hearsay.

Mark Jackson

Alameda County District Attorney's Office

In this digital age where technology continues to advance rapidly and reach billions of people around the globe, social media has become a popular form of communication. Through the use of various social media platforms, people can communicate by posting information, sharing photos or videos, sending messages, blogging, microblogging and rating services. Some go as far as revealing the intimate details of their lives such as personal relationships, political viewpoints or activities of the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up