By John Roemer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 1.
BERKELEY - An outspoken federal appellate judge has accused the immigration courts of trying to shield adverse decisions in asylum cases from higher judicial review.
It was a shot by a respected jurist taking aim at the administrative judges hired by the Department of Justice to hear immigration cases.
...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
This article appears on Page 1.
BERKELEY - An outspoken federal appellate judge has accused the immigration courts of trying to shield adverse decisions in asylum cases from higher judicial review.
It was a shot by a respected jurist taking aim at the administrative judges hired by the Department of Justice to hear immigration cases.
...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In