Real Estate/Development,
Government,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jan. 16, 2013
2012 eminent domain year in review
Last year federal funds continued to make their way to local projects and shovels continued to break ground for infrastructure projects - which led to increased eminent domain litigation.
Bradford B. Kuhn
Partner, Nossaman LLP
Phone: (949) 833-7800
Email: bkuhn@nossaman.com
Chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain and Valuation Practice Group, Bradford advises clients on all real property aspects of infrastructure and development projects. Mr. Kuhn represents public and private sector clients with real estate and business litigation matters, including eminent domain, inverse condemnation, land use/zoning, landlord/tenant, and construction disputes.
Rick E. Rayl
Member, Nossaman LLP
Email: rrayl@nossaman.com
Rick is chair of Nossaman's Eminent Domain and Valuation Practice Group and a member of the firm's Real Estate Practice Group. He is an experienced trial attorney dealing with eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and other real estate and business disputes.
As we look back on 2012, federal funds continued to make their way to local projects and shovels continued to break ground for infrastructure projects. This led to increasing eminent domain litigation - resulting in a high number of published appellate decisions.
California One of the subject areas that saw a lot of attention in 2012 (and will likely continue to be a focal point in 2013) is the debate over the roles of the judge and the jury in eminent domain cases. In ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In