Government
Jun. 9, 2017
It's absurd to claim SF health warning is invalid
Richard Samp's claim that San Francisco's billboard health warning ordinance must be invalidated on First Amendment grounds is absurd on factual grounds. By David Amkraut
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Richard Samp's claim that San Francisco's billboard health warning ordinance must be invalidated on First Amendment grounds is absurd on factual grounds. ("Courts diverge on commercial speech," June 2, 2017.)
The ordinance requires that billboard ads for sugar-sweetened drinks state, "Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay." Contr...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In