This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

May 20, 2003

Party Must Attack Punitives Proof at Trial or Waives Right to Do It Later

Focus Column - Litigation - By David Martinez - Defense practitioners navigating California's state courts are familiar with the state Supreme Court's holding in Adams v. Murakami , 54 Cal.3d 10 (1991), which gives defendants a nonwaivable right to post-verdict judicial review of a punitive-damages award. In a recent decision with constitutional implications, however, a divided 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel undercut the Adam rule's viability in federal court by holding that it must yield

        
        Focus Column
        
        Litigation
        
        By David Martinez
        
    ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)