California Courts of Appeal
Jun. 23, 2011
Embezzling Lawyer Loses Appeal
A lawyer convicted of embezzling from clients cannot use payments to his victims from the State Bar Client Security Fund to reduce what he owes them in court-ordered restitution, an appellate court ruled Tuesday.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A lawyer convicted of embezzling from clients cannot use payments to his victims from the State Bar Client Security Fund to reduce what he owes them in court-ordered restitution, an appellate court ruled Tuesday.
After all, the court held, the State Bar has "no contractual obligation to pay the dishonest attorney's debt." People v. Hume, A128757 (Cal. App. 1st Dist, filed J...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In