This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

May 18, 2010

Morgan Lewis Fighting Fraud Case

Attorneys defending Morgan, Lewis & Bockius against a fraud claim by a former client for its handling of a patent application are adopting a defense of "no harm, no foul."

By Craig Anderson

Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN JOSE - Attorneys defending Morgan, Lewis & Bockius against a fraud claim by a former client for its handling of a patent application are adopting a defense of "no harm, no foul."

Wendy Thurm, a San Francisco-based partner with Keker & Van Nest, argues that any mistake made by a former Morgan Lewis attorney was subsequently fixed by a Haynes & Boone patent pr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up