By Randall A. Spencer
In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 2010 DJDAR 4835, the Supreme Court rejected an attempt to restrict the availability of class actions in the federal courts and explained the interaction between the Rules of Decision Act and the Rules Enabling Act.
In Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S. Ct. 817 (1938), the Court held that under the Rules of Decision Act, (...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In