This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Tax,
Corporate

May 5, 2010

The 'Amazon Tax,' Too Good to Be True

The "Amazon tax's" seductive scheme may tempt Californians, but Kenneth Lee of Jenner & Block cautions that it is too good to be true.

San Diego

Kenneth K. Lee

Circuit Judge

Facing a gaping $20 billion budget deficit, the California state legislature has recently renewed its attempt to enact the so-called "Amazon tax," a tax that would apply to out-of-state online retailers that have no physical presence within the state.

Californians may be tempted by this seductive scheme: It brings in potentially up to an estimated $150 million into the state's coffers, but places the burden on faceless out-of-state companies that have no political clout in Califo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails