This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jul. 28, 2010

Do 'Special Answers' Make a Sound?

If a statute is enacted but not used, does it make a sound? By Dan Jacobson of Pacific West College of Law.

Daniel Lee Jacobson


By Dan Jacobson


If a statute is enacted but not used, does it make a sound? This philosophical, late-night dorm room talk question comes to mind when considering Code of Civil Procedure Section 428.70. Operative since 1972, Section 428.70 allows a third-party cross-defendant to assert defenses against the plaintiff's complaint. That's a pretty nifty device because by definition, a third-party cross-defendant has not been sued by the plaintiff, yet ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails