Litigation
Jan. 22, 2014
State Supreme Court may not reconsider punitive damages ceiling issue
The high court appears to have punted on reconsidering the standard establishing a ratio of 10-to-1 for punitive to compensatory damages for isolated incidents of wrongful conduct.
By Omar Shamout
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The California Supreme Court appears to have punted on reconsidering the standard establishing a ratio of 10-to-1 for punitive to compensatory damages for isolated incidents of wrongful conduct.
The court in an en banc order last week limiting arguments in Nickerson v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Co. instructed the attorneys to brief and argue only whether an award of attorney fees under Brandt v. Superior Court<...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In