U.S. Supreme Court
Jul. 1, 2014
Court gets it right on cellphone searches
A cellphone isn't a cigarette pack. This less-than-controversial premise drove the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Riley v. California. By Micah Schwartzbach
A cellphone isn't a cigarette pack. This less-than-controversial premise drove the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Riley v. California: that, without warrants, police officers can't search information stored on the mobile phones of those they arrest. 2014 DJDAR 8220 (June 26, 2014).
Though the court's rationale had to do primarily with smart phones, the ruling applies to all cellphones alike, even dinosaurs ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In