This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jan. 7, 2016

State high court debates open government, attorney confidentiality

The state Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to balance open government interests with legal confidentiality protections.

By Kevin Lee
Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN FRANCISCO ? The state Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to find middle ground between the public's interest in preserving open government and confidentiality protections afforded by the attorney-client privilege.

The city of Los Angeles is asking the justices to determine whether there are limits to the state's Public Records Act when a public entity "inadvertently" discloses documents that shou...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up