Labor/Employment
Jul. 9, 1999
Accommodation Landmine
By Mark A. Romeo In three cases decided last month, the U.S. Supreme Court provided specific guidance about what may and may not constitute a "disability" for purposes of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq. Sutton v. United Airlines Inc. , 1999 U.S.Lexis 4371 (June 22, 1999); Murphy v. United Parcel Service Inc. , 1999 U.S.Lexis 4370 (June 22, 1999); and Albertsons v. Kirkingburg , 1999 U.S.Lexis 4369 (June 22, 1999).
By Mark A. Romeo
In three cases decided last month, the U.S. Supreme Court provided specific guidance about what may and may not constitute a "disability" for purposes of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq. Sutton v. United Airlines Inc., 1999 U.S.Lexis 4371 (June 22, 1999); Murphy ...
In three cases decided last month, the U.S. Supreme Court provided specific guidance about what may and may not constitute a "disability" for purposes of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq. Sutton v. United Airlines Inc., 1999 U.S.Lexis 4371 (June 22, 1999); Murphy ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In