This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 29, 2011

Labels Matter, But No Reset to Pre-Prop. 64

Checking "general public" unfair-competition law class actions may now be more difficult. By Vanessa O. Wells and Paul J. Riehle of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP.


By Vanessa O. Wells and Paul J. Riehle


Some are concerned that Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.4th 310 (2011) signals a retreat from the beachhead gained by Proposition 64: Will businesses again be subjected to lawsuits brought by cardboard plaintiffs serving as fronts for lawyer-driven lawsuits? The opinion certainly raises some red flags.


Prop. 64 took aim at the cottage industry of "general public" unfair-competition law acti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up