This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 23, 2011

When Does the Five-Year Clock Stop Ticking?

The state Supreme Court clarifies the exceptions to the five-year rule for bringing lawsuits to trial. By Richard L. Kellner and Lina B. Melidonian of Kabateck Brown Kellner.


By Richard L. Kellner and Lina Melidonian


For years, litigants have attempted to navigate the unchartered waters of the "five-year rule," whose application and exceptions have been the subject of heated debate. This debate has been punctuated by the ultimate risk for the attorney who makes mistakes in the application of the five-year rule - the dismissal of his or her client's action for lack of prosecution.


The so-called five-year rule is...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up