Perspective
Sep. 20, 2012
Private utility, public doctrine
Last month, a state Court of Appeal found Southern California Edison, a private utility, liable for private property damage on an inverse condemnation theory. By Craig S. Simon and Mark S. Grotefeld
Last month, the 2nd District Court of Appeal handed down a new inverse condemnation decision, Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Southern California Edison Co., 2012 DJDAR 12351 (Aug. 30, 2012). This new decision upholds and explains Barham v. Southern California Edison Co., 74 Cal. App. 4th 744 (1999), which concluded that a privately owned public utility could be liable for inverse condemnation.
The...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In