This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Administrative/Regulatory

Feb. 6, 2015

Plaintiffs' attorneys, judges aim to rein in demurrers

A first-of-its-kind California effort to curb the use of demurrers in civil cases is moving forward in Sacramento, as plaintiff's attorneys and judges complain the objections are snarling up courts' law and motion calendars.


By Paul Jones


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SACRAMENTO - As litigants struggle with underfunded courts and packed trial calendars, some judges and tort lawyers are lining up behind an effort to crack down on the use of demurrers - objections favored by defense attorneys to strike down plaintiffs' causes of action. According to critics, demurrers are overused, delaying trials for months and snarling law and motion calendars.


Now there's a ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up