This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Employee Benefits

Feb. 6, 2015

No vesting in my backyard

In M&G Polymers USA LLC v. Tackett, decided last week, the U.S. Supreme Court finally got a case with the right facts and from the right circuit to reinterpret ERISA - correctly. By Bruce J. McNeil and Aisha Sanchez


By Bruce J. McNeil and Aisha Sanchez


The Employee Retirement Income Security Act makes it clear that while "pension benefits" (such as defined benefit plans and profit-sharing plans) automatically or eventually vest, "welfare benefits" (such as medical and disability plans) do not, enabling employers to modify or terminate welfare benefits unilaterally.


Notwithstanding this statutory backdrop, a case from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up