Last week, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a creditor's $1.5 billion security interest was extinguished because a third party filed an erroneous Uniform Commercial Code termination statement - a UCC-3 statement - with the creditor's consent. Because the creditor and their counsel knew that the third party intended to file the statement and had reviewed a draft, the court reasoned that the third party's law firm did...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In