This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jan. 27, 2015

State high court calls for review of anti-paparazzi statute

An appellate court will now determine the constitutionality of an anti-paparazzi state law.


By Matthew Blake


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Whether chasing Justin Bieber in a car at high speeds can land a photographer in jail for up to six months is now a question for the state appellate court.


The California Supreme Court has ordered the 2nd District Court of Appeal to review whether an anti-paparazzi driving statute is unconstitutional in a case involving freelance celebrity photographer Paul Raef. The high court did not cite the reas...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up