Where a sophisticated shopping center owner negotiates a lease with a powerful retailer, is it possible that one or more portions of a cotenancy provision can nevertheless be declared unenforceable? In a recent decision, Grand Prospect Partners LP v. Ross Dress for Less Inc., 2015 DJDAR 409 (Jan. 12, 2015) (certified for publication), addressing for the first time the enforceability of cotenancy clauses in commer...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In