This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Zoning, Planning and Use

Jan. 23, 2015

Clarification on cell tower dos, don'ts

Local governments, if they adjust their practices accordingly, could turn the recently decided T-Mobile South case into a victory and affirm local authority over cell tower building plans. By Gerard Lederer and Jordan Ferguson


By Gerard Lederer and Jordan Ferguson


In T-Mobile South v. City of Roswell, decided Jan. 14, the U.S. Supreme Court was asked what Congress meant when it established that "[a]ny decision ... to deny a [cell tower] request . . . shall be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record." 47 U. S. C. Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iii).


All nine justices agreed that a local government may employ two documents to deny ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up