This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jan. 10, 2015

Workers on long shifts must be paid if on call or asleep, state high court rules

In a decision favoring laborers who work 24-hour shifts, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that security guards who are required to remain on site must be paid for all their time regardless of whether they actually worked.


By Emily Green


Daily Journal Staff Writer


In a decision favoring laborers who work 24-hour shifts, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that security guards who are required to remain on site must be paid for all their time regardless of whether they actually worked.


Just because the guards may spend their on-call hours sleeping or watching television doesn't negate the reality that they are under the control of their employ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up