This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 7, 2016

Misguided attempt to fix privacy act

It is no secret that California's Invasion of Privacy Act is in need of reform. But recent attempts are misguided.l By Edward D. Totino and Monica D. Scott

It is no secret that California?s Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) is in need of reform. CIPA was originally enacted in the 1960s to put a stop to ?unethical industrial espionage and spying operations in California.? Part of CIPA, Penal Code Section 632, prohibits the intentional recording of "confidential communications," including telephone calls, without consent. Violators of CIPA may be subject to criminal prosecution and fines as well as subject to...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up