This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Constitutional Law,
California Supreme Court

Jul. 13, 2013

State high court avoids ruling on controversial DNA case, for now

The state Supreme Court directed a court of appeal to reconsider its 2011 decision declaring unconsitutional a California law requiring police to collect a DNA sample from anyone arrested of a felony.

By Emily Green

Daily Journal Staff Writer

In 2011, a state appellate court ruled that a California law requiring police to collect a DNA sample from anyone arrested of a felony was unconstitutional. The state Supreme Court promptly agreed to review that decision.

But this week, the state high court sent that case - People v. Buza, S196200 - back to the court of appeal to reconsider in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held police could take DNA s...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up