Litigation
Jul. 11, 2013
Anti-moonlighting rule applies to judges who retire, court rules
Dashing the hopes of state judges and justices who wish to retire early but are blocked by an anti-moonlighting rule from taking new state jobs until their terms end, a Los Angeles trial judge has backed the rule.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Dashing the hopes of state judges and justices who wish to retire early but are blocked by an anti-moonlighting rule from taking new state jobs until their terms end, a Los Angeles trial judge has held that valid policy concerns dating from gold rush days back the rule.
The tentative decision by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Richard L. Fruin Jr., issued July 5 but made public Tuesday, is a se...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In