Perspective
Jul. 4, 2013
High court rebukes employment commission, twice
The US high court's vicarious liability decision in June not only narrowed the definition of "supervisor," it was the second time last month that the court took issue with EEOC guidance. By Felicia R. Reid
In a week of landmark rulings on same-sex marriage and voting rights, it was easy to miss a significant employment law decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court. That is doubly true in California, where plaintiffs prefer suing under state anti-discrimination law. But in the midst of the media-grabbing opinions, in Vance v. Ball State University, 2013 DJDAR 8103 (June 24, 2013), the Supreme Court provided much-awaited guidance for employm...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In