This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Constitutional Law

Jun. 12, 2010

Miranda Rights: What a Difference a Generation Makes

For those advocating on behalf of the individual against the might of the government, there is now another hurdle to overcome.

Konrad Moore

Public Defender Kern County Public Defender's Office

Two truths emerge from Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010 DJDAR 8047), the U.S. Supreme Court's latest visitation of Miranda, the seminal decision which procedurally enshrined the constitutional protection against self-incrimination. The first, arguably inuring to society's benefit, is that countless more admissions and confessions will be admitted at criminal trials with a resultant increase in convictions. Most of those convicted will probably be guilty. Second, as a matter of law...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails