By Howard Hoffenberg
After a trip to the U.S. Supreme Court and an act of Congress overruling the High Court, the trademark anti-dilution case by Victoria's Secret against Victor's Secret ends with the lower courts crafting a judicial presumption of dilution under circumstances of semantic similarity between marks and a sexual product. This presumption could not be overcome by the junior user and Victoria's Secret won its case. (Victor'...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In