This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 3, 2010

Victoria's Secret Wins Trademark Anti-Dilution Case

Howard Hoffenberg examines Victoria's Secret's trademark dilution lawsuit against Victor's Little Secret, a purveyor of adult sexual devices.

By Howard Hoffenberg

After a trip to the U.S. Supreme Court and an act of Congress overruling the High Court, the trademark anti-dilution case by Victoria's Secret against Victor's Secret ends with the lower courts crafting a judicial presumption of dilution under circumstances of semantic similarity between marks and a sexual product. This presumption could not be overcome by the junior user and Victoria's Secret won its case. (Victor'...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up