This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jan. 29, 2009

In Law, Is IP Short for Impractical Panoply?

IP law has become the mutt of the legal world, with a confusing mix of rules governing copyrights, patents and trademarks.

Stuart Meyer

Partner, Fenwick & West LLP

Email: smeyer@fenwick.com

On Jan. 13, 2009, the Federal Circuit issued a decision that "barred at the threshold" the claims of a patent because they were directed to unpatentable subject matter. In re Comiskey, 2006-1286. The court based its decision on the Founding Fathers' recognition that the 1623 English Statue of Monopolies curtailed the crown's practice of "granting monopolies to court favorites in goods or businesses." One judge writing in dissent countered that the prohibited "patents" were patrona...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails