By Laura Ernde
Daily Journal Staff Writer A ruling Monday by the California Supreme Court will restrict clients from taking their attorneys to court over legal fee disputes. The court unanimously ruled that a law generally requiring fee disputes to be settled by the State Bar does not prevent attorneys from seeking traditional binding arbitration under the California Arbitration Act if that procedure fails. Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble &...
Daily Journal Staff Writer A ruling Monday by the California Supreme Court will restrict clients from taking their attorneys to court over legal fee disputes. The court unanimously ruled that a law generally requiring fee disputes to be settled by the State Bar does not prevent attorneys from seeking traditional binding arbitration under the California Arbitration Act if that procedure fails. Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble &...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




