On Oct. 8, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. Shauers, a case that presents an interesting take on the question of how closely courts can examine what takes place inside the "black box" of the jury room.
The case arose from a car accident in which a young couple hit a motorcyclist, causing injuries that eventually required the amputation of one of his legs. The motorcyclist sued the cou...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In