By Steven Crighton
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined last week to rehear a landmark fair use decision, but did remove language from its opinion that could have granted immunity to automated programs that flag supposedly copyright-violating content.
The court ruled in favor of plaintiff-appellee Stephanie Lenz last September in what has become known as the "Dancing Baby" case...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In