Litigation
Mar. 15, 2016
Serial lies by plaintiff raises questions about client veracity, lawyer ethics
The abrupt and theatrical ending to a Santa Monica pregnancy discrimination jury trial — in which the plaintiff was shown upon cross-examination to be a serial liar — raises questions about whether the plaintiff attorney should have known his client's true past and whether defense counsel deserved his Perry Mason moment.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
The abrupt and theatrical ending to a Santa Monica pregnancy discrimination jury trial - in which the plaintiff was shown upon cross-examination to be a serial liar - raises questions about whether the plaintiff attorney should have known his client's true past and whether defense counsel deserved his Perry Mason moment.
Three weeks prior to Sofia Rebellon's trial in her lawsuit against Dimens...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In