Perspective
Apr. 20, 2012
Private parts aren’t private: Florence v. Bd of Chosen Freeholders
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that police officers may require persons arrested for minor criminal offenses to expose the most intimate parts of their bodies. By Nanci L. Clarence and Mario A. Moya
Earlier this month, individual privacy (and perhaps the presumption of innocence) suffered a terrible defeat before the U.S. Supreme Court in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington, 566 U.S. ___ (2012). In a controversial 5-4 decision, the Court held that, with limited exception, police officers may require persons arrested for minor criminal offenses (and even those arrested for traffic infra...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In