This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Apr. 19, 2012

The future of patenting genes and biological molecules: when is 'enough' enough?

Biotech firms are holding their breath now that the Supreme Court has sent Myriad back down for consideration in light of Prometheus. By Dr. John Wetherell of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP


By Dr. John Wetherell


Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has sent the other Myriad gene patent case back to the Federal Circuit for consideration of its decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 US __ (2012), the biotech industry is collectively holding its breath. The Myriad case contains claims that are in three general categories: claims to compositions of isolated DNA; claims to methods of using the genes ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up