In March, the Los Angeles Times published two editorials criticizing a new law that asks California's judges to voluntarily disclose their gender identity and sexual orientation. The writers argued that the new questions, incorporated into an annual demographic survey, were an invasion of privacy and not effective because forty percent of judges did not respond.
The Los Angeles Times also questioned whether "ther...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In