This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Apr. 13, 2012

Brantley v. NBC Uni: tying consumers' hands in bringing antitrust tying claims

The 9th Circuit had made clear that plaintiffs must plead that tying affects a very specific type of competition. By Clifford H. Pearson and Alexander R. Safyan of Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny LLP


By Clifford H. Pearson and Alexander R. Safyan


The 9th Circuit's March 30 decision in Brantley v. NBC Universal, Inc., 2012 DJDAR 4215 (Mar. 30, 2012), has significant implications for consumers bringing tying claims under federal antitrust law. Brantley affirmed a district court's dismissal of a putative class action brought by consumers of cable and satellite television against television programmers and distributors. The plaintiffs allege...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up