This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Trusts & Estates

Apr. 12, 2012

How low can you go: the new standard for testamentary capacity

Recent decisions offer some guidance on the appropriate standard of testamentary capacity. By Megan Ferkel Earhart of Goldfard, Sturman & Averbach


By Megan Ferkel Earhart, J.D.


From Goodman v. Zimmerman to Walton v. Bank of California, California courts have long struggled with the correct standard to apply when measuring testamentary capacity to make or amend a trust. For example, in Goodman v. Zimmerman, 25 Cal.App.4th 1667 (1994), the 1st District Court of Appeal found that the decedent did not suffer from insane delusions if, but for the insane delusions, the decedent would not have...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up