This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Apr. 6, 2012

Something's got to give: overlapping antitrust laws create redundant claims

Overlapping state and federal antitrust laws allow claims to grow exponentially with the number of links in the supply chain. By Jake Sorensen and Lindsay Lutz of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP


By Jacob R. Sorensen and Lindsay A. Lutz


It is widely accepted that price-fixing should be punished and those who are harmed by it should be able to recover their damages. To that end, the Sherman Act allows a successful plaintiff in a price-fixing case to recover treble damages - three times the damages it actually suffered - as well as attorneys' fees and costs. This arguably provides a windfall to the plaintiff, but it serves a punitive and deterrent purpo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up