This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 31, 2012

Third-party witness statements: work product or not?

The state Supreme Court may clarify whether third-party witness statements are attorney work product. By David C. Moore of Lindahl Beck LLP


By David C. Moore


Attorneys often interview third-party percipient witnesses in connection with litigation. These interviews can uncover important facts and reveal the testimony the witness would likely give if deposed or called to testify in court.


If opposing attorneys learn that witness interviews have occurred, they may seek to compel production of any writings documenting the interviews. Efforts to compel disclosure of witness statements are nothi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up