This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Mar. 30, 2012

Court ponders limits of federalism in Medicaid case

Even as the U.S. Supreme Court considered Wednesday whether Congress forced states into expanding their Medicaid rolls, the justices sought to flesh out a broader legal theory of coercion.


By Robert Iafolla


Daily Journal Staff Writer


WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court's consideration on Wednesday of whether Congress forced states into expanding their Medicaid rolls also allowed the justices the chance to flesh out a legal theory of coercion that could rein in other federal spending programs.


The Obama administration's health care overhaul calls for states to broaden the criteria for who's eligible for Medicaid, a fe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up